Open Justice: Why Courts Should Be Transparent

Ever wondered why we hear about some court cases in the news but not others? That's where the concept of open justice comes in. Open justice means making sure court proceedings are transparent and accessible to the public, either in person or through media coverage. This helps keep the legal system honest and builds trust in how decisions are made.

When courts operate openly, everyone can see what’s happening behind the scenes. This reduces the risk of corruption or unfair treatment because the public and press can report on anything suspicious. For example, recent cases where families fought for media coverage show how important it is for transparency. They want the public to understand what’s going on and trust the system is fair.

How Does Open Justice Work?

Courts usually allow journalists to attend trials, record proceedings, and report on them. This way, people who cannot be there get the same information. However, sometimes courts restrict media access to protect privacy or sensitive details. These restrictions can cause debates about whether openness is being sacrificed.

Some argue that limiting media access blocks the public from knowing important facts, especially in high-profile cases. Families and advocacy groups often push back against such restrictions, demanding open coverage to ensure justice is served openly. These discussions are vital because they keep the balance between fairness and privacy in check.

Why Should You Care About Open Justice?

Open justice isn't just a legal term; it touches on our right to know what happens in courts that affect our communities. When courts hide information, it creates suspicion and doubt. But when they open their doors to the public and the press, it promotes fairness and accountability.

In everyday life, open justice means you can follow important trials, understand how laws are enforced, and see that nothing shady is going on behind closed doors. It empowers citizens to demand a system that works for everyone, not just a select few.

So next time you read about a legal case on the news, remember it's part of a bigger idea: courts opening up so we all get a clear picture of justice in action.

MP David Davis Criticizes Block on Lucy Letby Trial Article as 'Defiance of Open Justice'

MP David Davis Criticizes Block on Lucy Letby Trial Article as 'Defiance of Open Justice'

Sir David Davis has criticized the block on a New Yorker article about child killer Lucy Letby, arguing it defies open justice. The article questions the evidence used to convict Letby of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder six others. Davis calls for a review of the court order blocking the article in the UK, while Justice Secretary Alex Chalk emphasizes the importance of respecting the jury's verdict.

Read More